Anglicare, Beenleigh, QLD

Sector

Residential / Social Housing

Location

Beenleigh, QLD

22 Manila Street, Beenleigh QLD required a personalised fire engineering strategy to support Anglicare with a new residential facility for homeless accommodation while ensuring compliance with the National Construction Code (NCC) 2022. 

Our approach carefully balanced the need for regulatory compliance with practical design solutions, enabling an efficient fire strategy that aligns with the building’s unique function and operational needs.

The Challenges:

  • The building is a Class 3 (residential) facility with shared communal spaces, requiring a nuanced approach to fire compartmentation.
  • The public corridors on Level 00 did not comply with the BCA Deemed-to-Satisfy (DtS) provisions, as walls bounding these areas were not originally designed to be fire-rated.
  • Exit travel distances on Levels 01 and 02 exceeded the DtS limit necessitating a performance-based solution to demonstrate appropriate egress provisions.

The Solutions:

  • Developed a Performance Solution that allows specific public corridor walls to remain non-fire-rated while ensuring separation between residential units and communal areas through strategic fire compartmentation.
  • Enhanced egress measures by introducing fire-rated doors with smoke seals, enhanced detection and occupant warning.
  • Utilised quantitative fire modelling to assess smoke movement and demonstrate compliance with NCC Performance Requirements.

The Outcomes:

  • A compliant fire safety strategy tailored to support the efficient residential setting.
  • A fire strategy that supports vulnerable residents while delivering practical, regulatory-compliant fire safety measures.
  • A performance-based fire engineering solution that supports evacuation while respecting the operational needs of the facility.

This project exemplifies how fire engineering solutions can enhance safety, whilst supporting efficiency and achieving compliance in residential facilities.

5 Dudley Street, Highgate Hill, QLD

Sector

Residential

Location

Highgate Hill, QLD

5 Dudley Street, Highgate Hill required a tailored fire engineering approach to address the unique characteristics of the site while ensuring compliance with the Performance Requirements of the National Construction Code (NCC). 

Our strategy implemented innovative performance solutions – all while preserving the architectural intent of the development.

The Challenges

  • The rise in storeys is technically five due to the basement projecting above ground level at the rear, requiring strategic fire engineering solutions to support value and safety.
  • Several design elements, including fire hydrant coverage shortfalls, combustible ancillary elements, and egress provisions, required performance-based solutions. 
Dudley Street

The Solutions

  • Developed a fire safety strategy that aligns with the NCC while allowing flexibility in construction elements such as fire-resistance levels (FRLs) for slabs, columns, and ancillary elements.
  • Implemented performance-based solutions for fire hydrants, egress paths, and service penetrations to optimise safety without compromising the design vision.
  • Integrated fire engineering strategies, including sprinkler protection, occupant warning systems, and enhanced egress provisions, to ensure compliance.

The Outcomes

  • A fire-engineered residential development that meets safety standards while maintaining architectural and functional integrity.
  • Effective egress solutions and fire safety provisions that support the needs of residents and emergency responders.
  • A built environment that prioritises occupant safety without sacrificing architectural vision. 

Regal Twin Cinema, Graceville, QLD

Sector

Heritage / Cinema

Location

Graceville, QLD

The Regal Twin Cinema, Graceville QLD required a tailored fire engineering approach to support a refurbishment of the existing heritage-style cinema. 

Our solution balanced the need for regulatory compliance while maintaining the architectural character of the building. delivering a fire safety strategy that enables modern upgrades without compromising operational functionality.

The Challenges:

  • The cinema is an existing Class 9b building undergoing renovations, including the conversion of an existing room into a new cinema.
  • The Building Code of Australia (BCA) Deemed-to-Satisfy (DtS) provisions posed constraints on exit travel distances, requiring a performance-based solution.
  • Fire safety measures needed to integrate with the heritage aspects and existing fire strategy while ensuring full compliance with the National Construction Code (NCC) 2022.

The Solutions:

  • Developed a Performance Solution allowing extended egress travel distances while maintaining occupant safety through enhanced smoke detection.
  • Implemented additional smoke detectors and containment measures to offset increased travel distances and support timely evacuation.
  • Introduced self-closing solid core doors to manage smoke movement within key circulation spaces.

The Outcomes:

  • A compliant fire safety strategy that enables continued use and future adaptability of the cinema.
  • A solution that respects the architectural intent of the refurbishment while prioritising occupant safety.
  • A performance-based fire engineering approach that supports evacuation while aligning with NCC Performance Requirements.

This project demonstrates how performance-based fire engineering can provide a practical yet innovative approach to managing fire safety in heritage buildings. 

26-28 Curwen Terrace, Chermside, QLD

Sector

Residential

Location

Chermside, QLD

This residential project at 26-28 Curwen Terrace, Chermside, QLD, required a fire safety solution as innovative as its design. 

Our fire engineering approach balanced the needs of modern living with compliance measures to ensure safety and flexibility for this 10-storey residential development with basement carpark facilities.

The Challenges

  • Mixed-use fire separation: Ensuring safe integration of Class 2 residential spaces and Class 7a carpark areas, particularly where glazing and fire walls intersect.
  • Modern materials and systems: Accommodating PVC ductwork and balcony blinds while mitigating fire risk.
  • Egress pathways: Extending exit travel distances and refining discharge points while optimising evacuation safety.

The Solutions

  • Performance-based fire separation: Fire-rated walls with external wetting sprinklers and toughened glazing to separate the residential and carpark areas.
  • Innovative material solutions: Allowing PVC ducts in concealed spaces with stringent material performance criteria and enhanced sprinkler protection.
  • Improved egress design: Rationalising exit travel distances and additional fire-rated lobbies to optimise fire-isolated stairway discharge locations in order to maximise entry foyer flexibility.

The Outcomes

  • Enhanced safety and compliance: A Performance Solution achieving compliance with the NCC 2019 Amendment 1, safeguarding both residents and visitors.
  • Architectural integration: Ensuring that modern material choices and design features, such as balcony blinds, align with fire safety requirements.
  • Future-ready residential spaces: A building designed with long-term peace of mind for all occupants. 

59 Collings Street, Balmoral, QLD

Sector

Residential

Location

Balmoral, QLD

This multi-level residential project at 59 Collings Street, Balmoral, called for an innovative fire engineering approach to overcome the challenges of a modern Class 2 residential building with associate carpark facilities. 

Our strategy focused on ensuring compliance with fire safety standards, including supporting EV Charing Station installation, while respecting the architectural vision and functional requirements of the design.

The Challenges

  • Boundary proximity and fire separation: Managing openings in external walls and carpark exhaust grilles within 3m of the allotment boundary required specialised protective measures.
  • Extended egress distances: Deviations in travel distances for exits on basement and ground levels needed a performance-based assessment to demonstrate safe evacuation.
  • Innovative design features: Addressing the insulation criteria of lift doors in apartment bounding construction and supporting the central stairway discharge design.

The Solutions

  • Custom fire protection solutions: Implementation of fire-rated wing walls and fire attenuation screens to minimise radiant heat to and from allotment boundaries.
  • Enhanced egress provisions: Increased exit travel distances supported by fire-rated separation and improved detection systems.
  • Specialised safety measures: Provisions for electric vehicle charging stations in the carpark, ensuring safety and compliance with National Construction Code (NCC) and best practices.

The Outcomes

  • Code-compliant safety design: A performance-based fire safety solution aligned with the NCC 2022, ensuring full compliance without compromising design intent.
  • Long-term safety: Robust fire safety measures that protect building occupants and infrastructure now and into the future.
  • Functional and future-ready spaces: A thoughtfully designed residential and carpark facility supporting modern living and evolving technology.  

43 Wambool Street, Bulimba, QLD

Sector

Residential

Location

Bulimba, QLD

This residential apartment project at 43 Wambool Street, Bulimba, QLD required a tailored fire safety strategy to address the challenges of modern residential design within a compact, multi-level structure. 

Our approach balanced the requirements of compliance with the architectural vision.

The Challenges

  • Mixed-use fire safety: Class 2 residential spaces with a Class 7a basement carpark.
  • Performance-based compliance: Addressing deviations from prescriptive DtS provisions, including fire separation, exit travel distances, and fire hydrant configurations.
  • Innovative compartmentation: Managing fire shutter designs that exceed traditional lengths and lacked insulation criteria to support spatial efficiency.

The Solutions

  • Enhanced fire protection systems: Wall wetting sprinklers paired with fire-rated shutters to ensure fire compartmentation while optimising design flexibility.
  • Custom egress designs: Rationalised exit travel distances and optimised fire-isolated stairway discharge pathways to support compliance and architectural design.
  • Hydrant booster redesign: Strategically positioned fire hydrant system with rationalised enclosures to meet safety standards while accommodating site constraints.

The Outcomes

  • Regulatory compliance: A performance-based solution aligned with NCC 2019 Amendment 1 and QFD requirements.
  • Safety-first approach: A residential building with enhanced fire safety measures ensuring protection for residents and visitors alike.
  • Future-ready apartments: A design that meets modern living standards while prioritising fire safety and operational efficiency.  

470 Lytton Road, Morningside, QLD

Sector

Industrial

Location

Morningside, QLD

This existing industrial development at 470 Lytton Road, Morningside, QLD, required a carefully crafted fire safety strategy to enhance an existing warehouse into a safer facility.

Our approach considered the unique characteristics of the building and its dated fire safety systems, integrating modern compliance measures while supporting operational efficiency with a pragmatic approach.

The Challenges

  • Aging fire systems: The building’s existing fire hydrant and sprinkler systems dated back decades, requiring significant upgrades to meet current safety standards.
  • Decommissioning smoke exhaust fans: Outdated ceiling-mounted exhaust systems were inadequate, demanding innovative alternatives for smoke hazard management.
  • Extended egress distances: Modifying exit travel pathways in the warehouse to accommodate modern operational layouts and fire safety requirements. 

The Solutions

  • Hydrant and sprinkler upgrades: Retrofitting fire safety systems to achieve compliance with AS 2118.1:2017 and AS 2419.1:2005, improving pressure, coverage, and functionality.
  • Modern smoke detection systems: Installing smoke detectors throughout the building, ensuring early hazard identification and reduced alarm times.
  • Optimised egress design: Performance-based assessments allowed for extended travel distances, supported by improved detection systems and fire management strategies.

The Outcomes

  • Enhanced safety: The building now features modernised fire systems that provide appropriate protection for occupants and assets.
  • Regulatory compliance: All fire engineering modifications align with Section 68 of the Building Act 1975, securing compliance while respecting the building’s existing structure.
  • Future-ready design: The improvements ensure Building 11 as part of the precinct is well-equipped to serve operational needs safely and efficiently for years to come. 

383 Wickham Terrace, Spring Hill, QLD

Sector

Residential / Adaptive Reuse

Location

Spring Hill, QLD

This remarkable redevelopment project at 383 Wickham Terrace, Spring Hill, QLD, called for a customised fire safety strategy to accommodate the unique challenges of transforming an existing office building into a modern residential development. 

Our fire engineering approach was meticulously developed to ensure compliance with fire safety requirements while supporting the innovative design and a pragmatic approach.

The Challenges

  • Mixed-use adaptation: Conversion of an 8-storey office building into a residential building (Class 2), with a carpark (Class 7a) and additional penthouse storeys.
  • Complex site conditions: Existing building elements, structure and exits coupled with limited floor area to accommodate building infrastructure.
  • Performance deviations: Addressing existing construction and innovative design, including timber framing for penthouse levels, trellis vegetation, EV Charging Stations and extended egress travel distances.

The Solutions

  • Fire Services: Custom solutions to support rationalised and modified fire services with a keen consideration of spatial limitations in the existing building.
  • Enhanced safety for EV chargers: Special provisions for carpark safety, including measures for electric vehicle charging stations to mitigate fire hazards.
  • Innovative design flexibility: Allowing the inclusion of non-combustible trellises with climbing vegetation and timber-framed penthouse walls while maintaining safety.

The Outcomes

  • Future-ready design: A building that seamlessly integrates modern residential amenities while prioritising fire safety.
  • Compliance achieved: All performance solutions meet the performance requirements of the National Construction Code (NCC) 2022.
  • Safety without compromise: Retention of the existing building through a considered adaptive reuse strategy where fire safety is central  

TS Vampire, Tweed Head, NSW

Sector

Defence

Location

Tweed Heads South, NSW

This unique refurbishment project at 111 Dry Dock Road, Tweed Heads South, NSW, required a tailored fire safety solution. 

Our approach carefully considered the constraints of an existing Class 9b fire strategy while accommodating the building’s new mixed-use functions—all in support of its critical role in cadet training and administration.

The Challenges

  • The building’s change-in-use: Converting portions of the Ground Floor to Class 3 accommodation for cadets, alongside maintaining Class 5 office and Class 9b training/lecture spaces, demanded compliance with updated fire safety standards.
  • Retrofitting fire ratings: The building’s blockwork construction required significant upgrades to meet the fire resistance levels (FRL) for modern use, particularly in areas now serving as accommodation.
  • Egress provisions: Modifying the design to ensure safe and efficient evacuation, while maintaining the building’s architectural integrity, was a key focus. 

The Solutions

  • Enhanced fire separation: Upgraded blockwork walls and ceiling systems, incorporating fire-rated plasterboard and mastic sealing to mitigate fire spread.
  • Direct egress routes: Each accommodation unit now includes direct access to the outside for enhanced occupant safety.
  • Improved fire detection and warning systems: Existing systems were upgraded to meet modern standards, including ceiling-mounted smoke detectors and enhanced occupant warning systems tailored to the building’s unique needs.

The Outcomes

  • Compliance without compromise: The Performance Solution ensured the building met relevant standards under the NCC 2022 and Defence guidelines.
  • Safety-first design: Occupants benefit from robust fire safety measures, including early detection and efficient evacuation pathways.
  • A multi-functional space: The refurbished building supports Defence operational needs, offering flexible use for training, lectures, and accommodation. 

Bluey’s World, Northshore Pavilion, QLD

Location

Hamilton, QLD

Bluey’s World, required a fire engineering solution tailored to its unique and temporary design – while also being fit for Australian TV royalty!

In our approach to this unique and exiting project we considered the constraints of the Building Code of Australia (BCA) and guidance provided in the ABCB Temporary Structures Standard to enable flexibility for a dynamic and immersive visitor experience – all while ensuring compliance and safety for this extraordinary exhibition.

The Challenges

  • The development comprises three single-story Class 9b buildings linked by covered walkways, requiring bespoke solutions to address their temporary nature.
  • As the buildings are assembled atop an existing car park, practical measures for fire hydrant infrastructure needed to be explored.
  • Many of the building materials for these types of structures are tested to European and British Standards mandating a sound understanding of the nuances between overseas and Australian fire testing.

The Solutions

  • Assessment of building materials tested to overseas standards which supported their installation as part of the exhibition.
  • Developed a fire hydrant strategy that considered the temporary nature of the facility through consultation and agreement with the fire brigade.
  • Assessed egress provisions through consideration of the inherent building characteristics and managed evacuation strategy.

The Outcome

  • A safe, immersive experience for visitors, with buildings that prioritise fire safety while supporting the exhibition’s temporary nature.
  • Flexible fire safety solutions that align with the production managers vision and operational needs of Bluey’s World.
  • A performance-based fire safety strategy achieving compliance with the BCA. 

Which is which? Understanding the different fire safety roles

Fire safety roles: a fire safety engineer, fire protection services designer and passive fire installer.

The might all sound similar – and they certainly all play with fire (the safe way of course). 

But these three important fire safety roles are all critical to ensuring fire safety is achieved.

These three distinct roles work together closely to contribute to the fire safety of a project – but they often get confused.

We’ve put together a summary of what each does, along with some tidbits about how they create value and how you can get the most out of each in your next building project. 

As is so often the case – the earlier the better is always true!

fire safety roles
Fire Safety Engineer

A fire safety engineer:

  • Develops Performance Based Solutions to provide value to the project (deviating from the restrictive Deemed to Satisfy Provisions of the Building Code of Australia).
  • Demonstrates safety through showing that the building meets the performance requirements of the BCA.
  • Looks for opportunities to proactively provide value (an experienced fire engineer should do this even before Development Application is submitted and even when not asked to, it’s about achieving the best possible outcome for the project and our clients).
How they deliver value

They create value through:

  • Efficiency – being value for money (hitting budgets!) to support the project program.
  • Future proofing – Championing great design that works now and into the future.
  • Architectural – Supporting creative architectural design to help in leaving a legacy we can be proud of.
Fire Protection Services Designer:

A Fire Protection Services Designer designs the following systems in bespoke software and produces drawings through design stages and for construction e.g. Dwg and Revit:

  • Fire hose reels
  • Fire extinguishers
  • Fire hydrant system
  • Fire sprinkler system
  • Foam suppression
  • Gas suppression
  • Fire detection system – smoke, heat, flame etc.

They possess a sound understanding of all of the Australian Standards associated with the fire safety systems they design.

Where there are opportunities, they often propose Performance Based Solutions for the ‘fire safety engineer’ to consider for the project to achieve an efficient design outcome.

TIP: Communication matters

Open lines of communication between fire protection services designers and fire safety engineers is key to achieve a practical and economic outcome. They need to work hand in hand so that the fire safety engineer can understand and endorse their design proposals (where it stacks up of course, it needs to be safe).

Passive Fire Installer:

A Passive Fire Installer:

  • Installs specific fire rated elements on your project (e.g. light weight fire rated walls, fire rated ceilings, treats fire rated penetrations, fire rating to steel beams and columns etc.).
  • Has specialist knowledge in fire rated systems from various manufacturers in the market (helps you find the right product for the job that is compliant).
  • Determines the available passive fire rating systems that can be installed to achieve the FRLs.

Where there is no tested system available, the passive fire installer may propose for the manufacturer to get more testing done or for a deviation to be proposed to the fire engineer for their assessment.

Often for existing buildings, it is key that the passive fire installer is brought on early to provide advice regarding achieving fire rating and also where finding the right tested system might be challenging.

TIP: Earlier the better

Passive fire installer involvement early is often key for existing building, heritage and adaptive reuse projects.

How to structure an agenda that actually works for your QFES Fire engineering Brief meeting

How do you structure the agenda for a Fire Engineering Brief (FEB) meeting with Queensland Fire & Emergency Services (QFES)?

Your application with the Queensland Fire and Emergency Services is in. 

You’ve figured out who you should invite to the Fire Engineering Brief (FEB) meeting.

There’s just one thing left to do – figure out what you’re actually going to talk about!

Structuring an agenda that’s actually going to work for you is a skill. Luckily it’s one our team of experienced fire engineers has has a lot of practice doing. 

We’ve put together a complete draft agenda for you to use as a cheat sheet, along with our top pieces of advice for how run your next Fire Engineering Brief meeting so that you’re a lot more likely to get the result you’re after.

Before we dive in, a quick recap on who will be there:

Let’s look at an example of a standard Fire Engineering Brief meeting – because of course, different projects will call for different specialists.

For a typical project, the guest list would generally include the following stakeholders:

  • Building Certifier
  • Architect
  • Fire Engineer
  • Client Representative

It could potentially also include

  • Fire Protection Services Designer
  • Mechanical or Structural Engineer
Your draft Agenda for a Fire Engineering Brief Meeting
1. Introduction

To kick things off, the Architect gives a high-level overview of the building and any significant features.

2. Key Building Characteristics

Next, the Building certifier provides the key building characteristics such as:

  • effective height
  • rise in storeys
  • number of storeys contained
  • large isolated building (if applicable)
  • required fire safety systems under the BCA etc.
At this point, the team fields any questions that QFES have with respect to the building design and BCA parameters. 
 
4. Fire Strategy Presentation

Te fire engineer then presents the fire strategy for the development:

  • Systematically works through the fire engineered Performance Solutions and supporting fire design requirements, proposed assessment methodologies and acceptance criteria.
  • Seeks feedback and endorsement of the Performance Solutions proposed.
  • Resolves any feedback during the meeting, if possible (otherwise feedback may require further consultation with the design team post meeting).

Once again, the team fields any questions that the QFES may have.

Often there are queries with respect to the fire safety systems in the building and their design.

This is where a fire protection services designer being present in the meeting can also assist, particularly for complex developments. 

5. Fire protection services

Should the fire protection services designer be attending the meeting, it is often advisable to provide an overview of the fire safety system design. For example:

  • booster locations
  • what standards the fire sprinklers and detection system will be designed to
  • etc.

This can occur between the building certifier giving an overview of BCA compliance and the fire engineer presenting the fire strategy.

This can help set the scene and provide QFES with a better understanding of the building in terms of safety provisions before getting into the fire engineering detail.

6. Mechanical Engineering

Should the mechanical or structural engineers be attending the meeting, it is often advisable for them to support the fire engineer when the relevant Performance Solutions applicable to their specialised field are raised.

The QFES may ask questions pertaining to the mechanical design or structural design to understand cause and effect or other ambiguities.

Meeting Minutes

The building certifier typically takes meeting minutes and distributes these post Fire Engineering Brief meeting.

All attendees need to read the meeting minutes and provide applicable comments to ensure that everything is captured.

The meeting minutes play a key role in ensuring that feedback and discussions are recorded to enable project stakeholders to take appropriate action – whether this is to resolve any outstanding feedback items or to proceed to the Fire Engineering Report based on endorsement of the fire strategy presented.

Remember - it's a team effort!

Whilst the building certifier and fire engineer drive the meeting, everyone is working towards the same goal of demonstrating that the design proposals makes sense, meets the Performance Requirements of the BCA and is safe. 

It’s a team effort to arrive at the best possible outcome for our clients.

Who should attend a Fire Engineering Brief (FEB) meeting with Queensland Fire & Emergency Services (QFES)?

Who should attend a Fire Engineering Brief (FEB) meeting with Queensland Fire & Emergency Services?

Your application with the Queensland Fire and Emergency Services is in. It took a lot of work, but you got there.

And now you’re ready for the next stage – for the Fire Engineering Brief (FEB) meeting!

 But that’s just presented you with a whole new set of questions, that, believe it or not are very common.

Here's what our clients usually want to know about Fire Engineering BRief meetings:

People want to know specifics like:

  • Can our clients come?
  • What designers do we need to bring to the meeting?
  • How many people should attend?

These are fair questions to ask they aren’t always straight forward to answer.

And as is so often the case, the answer is – it depends on the project.

The four key project stakeholders you need to think about

You want to break it down to look at the four key project stakeholders who are most typically involved:

  • Building Certifier
  • Fire Engineer
  • Architect
  • Client Representative

These four project stakeholders are the four pillars that should be at a Fire Engineering Brief meeting with the Queensland Fire and Emergency Services meeting to discuss the proposed building design with the Building Approvals Officers (BAO).

The Building Certifier

The Building Certifier:

  • The Building Certifier plays an important role during the meeting of describing building characteristics and the proposed departures from the BCA.
  • The Queensland Fire and Emergency Services acts as an advisory agency to the Building Certifier first and foremost.
The Fire Engineer

The Fire Engineer:

  • Presents the fire engineered Performance Solutions and supporting fire design requirements.
  • Discusses the proposed assessment methodologies and analysis.
  • Seeks feedback to understand any concerns and challenges with the intent of progressing towards endorsement of the fire strategy to proceed to Fire Engineering Report (FER) stage.
The architect

The Architect:

  • Provides a general overview of the building design.
  • Contributes to understanding how the building works architecturally and any nuances.
  • Delves into detail where needed to understand the building in the context of the fire strategy.
The Client Representative

The Client Representative:

  • Can be a project Manager, Design Manager, actual client etc.
  • They attend to understand the outcomes of the meeting and to contribute when specific information is needed.
Who else can provide value at a Fire Engineering Brief Meeting?

There are a variety of other stakeholders that can potentially provide value at a Fire Engineering Brief.

The trick is to figure out which ones you need to bring in and when!

Fire Protection Services Designer (wet/dry fire)

When the fire strategy involves considerable fire safety systems (e.g. fire hydrants, fire sprinklers, detection), the Fire Protection Services Designer plays an important role in talking to the fire brigade infrastructure.

Mechanical Engineer

When the fire strategy involves a complex smoke hazard management strategy (e.g. retail malls, atriums, high rise commercial and the like), the Mechanical Services Designer contributes to the understanding of how the systems will operate. 

Structural Engineer

When the fire strategy involves considerable rationalisation/reduction of structural FRLs (e.g. Stadiums with considerable unprotected steel), the Structural Engineer provides an overview of the structural design and how it works. The structural engineer also answers questions with respect to failure mechanisms, load ratios and other important structural considerations.

But wait - there's more!

In some case, there are other fringe specialists that can attend a Fire engineering brief meeting!

For example: Horticulturalists can be required where proposing significant greenery to the facades of buildings.

But for the large majority of buildings, only the four key stakeholders are typically required.

Ultimately, less is more though

Remember the old saying “too many cooks spoil the broth”?

Ideally, the FEB meeting should be limited in number to the key stakeholders only with select optional designers needed to provide additional understanding, with one representative from each as a general rule.

What if the Queensland Fire and Emergency Services (QFES) rejects my performance solution?!​

What if the Queensland Fire and Emergency Services (QFES) rejects my performance solution?!

You’ve slaved over your application. You were sure you’d thought of everything. Then, bam – the Queensland Fire and Emergency Services (QFES) rejects your fire safety performance solution.

It’s the last thing you want to happen. 

That’s why it’s so important to take steps before you submit your fire safety solution to mitigate the chances of things going sideways.

How likely is it that I need to worry about this?

There are a few things you need to consider at the outset to determine if rejection is a likelihood for your project.

There are a few questions  you can ask yourself to check, like:

  • What departures are there from the National Construction Code (NCC)?
  • What new departures might arise during design that need to be considered?
  • Are any of the items risky and if so, what is the likelihood of them being supported?
First, is your fire engineer satisfied?

Is your fire engineer satisfied that the Performance Solution proposed can meet the mandatory Performance Requirements of the Building Code of Australia?

The answer should always be YES! Otherwise, they should not be supporting and presenting the Performance Solution to QFES in the first place. This is your first check box.

An experienced fire safety engineer may have encountered similar Performance Solutions previously and can draw upon their prior experience to provide a guide to whether the Queensland Fire and Emergency Services (QFES) is likely (not guaranteed!) to support the proposal.

TIP: Control the controllable

Remember that the Queensland Fire and Emergency Service does not recognise precedence and each development is subject to its own assessment based on its own merits and the ever-changing built environment.  Just because it has been done before, doesn’t mean that it can be done forever. 

A better question to ask is: What can we do in our zone of control to set ourselves up for the highest chance of success?

 
What practical steps can you take to increase your chances?

Build a strong case: After ensuring that your Performance Solution meets the Performance Requirements of the Building Code of Australia, your fire engineer can make a strong case for their Performance Solution and demonstrate the validity.

Communicate clearly: Clearly explain the departures from the Building Code. Detail provisions in layman terms so all stakeholders in the QFES meeting can understand. Explain what a solution looks like and how it demonstrates compliance.

Use visual aids: Markups on architectural and design drawings clearly showing the fire safety requirements proposed to support the Performance Solution. Architects can even provide 3D models to help explain where the concept is complicated!

TIP: KEEP IT SIMPLE, STUPID

A picture paints a thousand words: QFES building approval officers are not intimately knowledgeable of your development.  Markups of drawings and 3D models go a long way to bridging that knowledge gap in a short period of time and clearly explaining what you are proposing.

Don’t get too technical: QFES are educated in fire safety and have extensive experience in fire brigade operations, but they may not be across all technical and esoteric aspects of fire safety engineering – so be careful not to delve into too much detail, unless requested.

You can't be too prepared.

Anticipating the Queensland Fire and Emergency Services position is a critical element to ensuring success.

You can do this by:

  • Trying to predict fire brigade questions before the meeting.
  • Being prepared to answer with respect to their concerns.
  • Being open to feedback and actively listening.

Where appropriate rebut if confident the strategy addresses the feedback. Be respectful and remember – we are in the same business which is to make buildings safe.

TIP: It's ok to ask for more time

If you don’t know the answer and/or need to review their feedback, it is often advisable to take it away and resolve with your team.

Then provide formal feedback addressing each item for Queensland Fire and Emergency Services review.

Consider a second meeting if there are still concerns or clarity is required.

Honesty is the best policy

If there is no rationale to propose a Performance Solution for the design departure, be honest with your clients.

Don’t try to pin it on the Queensland Fire and Emergency Services hoping that when you walk into the meeting that they will shut it down.

This goes back to the fact that the fire engineer must be certain that their Performance Solution meets the mandatory Performance Requirements of the Building Code of Australia (BCA). 

TIP: Be prepared with a back-up plan

Prepare for the eventuation that the QFES does reject the higher risk performance solutions by preparing additional alternative options in advance.

This way, you can be prepared with a ‘worst case’ plan and costing earlier so there are less surprises for your client down the track!

Demystifying Development Applications: A fire safety engineering perspective

How to write the perfect Development Application: a practical roadmap to success

Securing a Development Application (DA) – by convincing a council to agree to a new building in principle – is no small feat.

Just ask anyone who’s ever completed one!

It’s not just about navigating through council approvals though; it’s about envisioning a future that’s both functional and innovative.

Factors like traffic, solar impacts, waste management, and trees all play pivotal roles and doubt spring easily to mind.

One aspect often relegated to the background however, is fire safety and Building Code of Australia (BCA) compliance.

With so much to think about it’s not a surprise – but the impacts of neglecting to prioritise or understand fire safety can be far reaching. 

Projects can face major changes - or even fall over completely - if fire safety isn’t considered until after a Development Application has been completed.

We’ve seen:

  • Residential buildings require sprinkler protection (due to lack of safety review prior to DA approval)
  • The surprise introduction of very large hydrant and sprinkler tanks, taking up valuable floor space
  • Major structural issues in a basement storage area are due to the requirement for 4 hour fire rated walls

These examples and many more showcase that fire safety is not merely a checkbox – but rather a key to unlocking a project’s true potential that can make all the difference.

In this article, we delve into seven strategic steps that can take a DA from a blueprint to a triumph. 

1. Early Engagement with Fire Engineering

In the cacophony of construction, fire safety is the underlying rhythm that keeps everything in harmony. For this reason, it’s critical to consider engaging a fire engineer as early as possible.

In fact, they should ideally be the second consultant you collaborate with after your structural engineer!

This decision can make or break the trajectory of your project.

Fire engineers are not just experts in safety; they’re visionaries who can bring architectural aspirations to life, by ensuring that every nook and cranny of your design aligns with fire safety protocols. 

2. Fusing Aspirations and Realities

The journey of a successful DA begins with a conversation, a dialogue in which architectural aspirations meet the pragmatic intricacies of fire safety.

During this phase, it’s crucial to articulate your desires clearly.

  • Do you have specific architectural requirements that must be met?
  • Are sustainability goals at the core of your project?
  • What’s your strategy for the asset once it’s completed—will it be sold, leased, or held?

Understanding your target audience and the desired timeline is also pivotal. Sharing these details with your fire engineer will ensure that their strategies align with your vision. 

3. Exploring the Possibilities

Now comes the phase where fire engineers get to truly shine as creative problem solvers.

Unleash their expertise and let them explore performance solutions that go beyond conventional boundaries.

This stage is not about ticking boxes; it’s about innovation.

By collaborating closely with your fire engineer, even delving into minute details, you allow for potential risks to be identified and mitigated as early as possible.

This stage also involves understanding the fundamental fire engineering requirements that your project demands. Do you need hydrants, hose reels, or smoke detection systems?

Explore the advantages of additional safety measures like sprinklers or enhanced smoke detection. These considerations can unlock untapped potential in your project. 

4. Refining the Vision

Armed with insights from your fire engineer, it’s time to refine your project strategy.

Discuss the options they present and evaluate how these solutions align with your aspirations.

Additionally, obtain high-level pricing estimates for these solutions. This step is akin to sculpting; you’re chiselling away the excess to reveal the refined form of your project.

The goal is to find a balance between innovation, safety, and budgetary considerations. 

5. Placing the Building Blocks

Fire safety systems are the architectural pillars of your project, ensuring its stability and resilience.

Now is the time to decide the placement of major fire safety equipment.

Questions to ponder include things like, where will fire hydrant boosters be located and are they compliant with regulations?

Do you need a tank for the fire hydrant system? If so, where will it be positioned, and what size will it be?

Similarly, consider the placement of the fire indicator panel and ensure that exit discharge locations align with performance solutions. 

6. Crafting the Approvals Strategy

Navigating the labyrinth of approvals requires a strategic approach.

Ideally it involves:

  • Developing a clear program and strategy for approvals
  • Identifying if Fire Brigade referral is necessary and understanding the associated timelines
  • Seeking guidance from a Principal Certifying Authority (PCA) to address any BCA interpretations that could impact the assessment.

An emerging consideration is whether to measure through or around car parking spaces, highlighting the complexity of modern construction.

7. Documenting the Vision

As your DA takes shape, documenting your fire safety strategy becomes imperative.

Collaborate closely with your fire engineer to craft a concept strategy for submission.

This report should encompass a trial concept design outlining fire safety measures, proposed fire safety infrastructure locations, and a schedule of performance solutions. Clearly articulate assumptions or dependencies on which your approach relies.

Investing the effort upfront may seem daunting, but it is the key to minimising risks and ensuring a smoother project journey.

By placing fire safety at the core of your DA process, you’re not just building a structure; you’re crafting a legacy.

It’s a journey that demands meticulous attention to detail and a strategic approach.

From the spark of an idea to the final stroke of approval, fire safety is the guiding star that lines the path to architectural excellence. 

Mastering the DA Process

A Development Application is more than a document; it’s a declaration of your vision.

By embracing fire safety as an integral element, you’re not just gaining regulatory approval; you’re unlocking the potential of your project.

Through collaboration, innovation, and strategic planning, fire safety becomes the secret to crafting a masterpiece that stands as a testament to your goals.

In this intricate dance of creativity and compliance, fire safety engineers are your partners in turning construction dreams into reality.

So, before your next DA endeavour, remember that the canvas of architecture is waiting for your fire safety brushstrokes to colour its potential. 

Don’t Get Burned: Here’s how to tackle the 5 most common fire safety challenges like a pro

Don't Get Burned: Here’s how to tackle the 5 most common fire safety challenges like a pro

When it comes to building design and construction, there’s arguably nothing more important than fire safety engineering.

Whichever way you look at it – compliance, safety, value, good sense – it’s easy to see that protecting your building and its occupants is an important (and obviously) good move.

But here's the thing: fire safety engineering isn't always easy.

In fact, there’s a whole slew of common challenges that can make it tricky for project managers to ensure that everything is up to code and everyone is safe so they can confidently say their job is truly done.

We’ve seen it all when it comes to fire safety engineering, and we know the most effective solutions to keep your building and its occupants protected.

So if you want some hot(!) tips, keep reading…

1. Prioritising occupants with functional, fearless design

One of the key challenges in fire safety engineering is designing fire safety systems that are tailored to the specific needs of the building and its occupants.

This can include considerations such as the size and layout of the building, the number of occupants, and the types of activities that take place within the building.

The trouble is that it’s easy to treat safety engineering as a ‘tick box’ that can happen at a later stage in the management of a project – when in actual fact it’s a delicate dance between form and function, with the aim of landing in a place where you don’t have to compromise on either.

A high quality solution, delivered by fire safety experts can and should cater for both these important aspects – but this is only possible if the right needs have been prioritised early on and with deep consideration.

2. Integrating fire safety from the ground up

Another challenge in fire safety engineering is integrating fire safety systems with other important building systems and technologies, such as heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems, lighting, and security systems.

This can be particularly challenging in larger or more complex buildings where multiple systems may be in use.

Effective coordination between different systems is critical here, and the best approach for a project manager is to ensure that the design phase covers all systems and technologies present, through consultation with all relevant stakeholders – from suppliers, to fire safety engineers, to builders – so that an integrated solution is what’s being implemented from the start.

The last thing anyone wants is to be shoehorning in fire safety solutions, after the fact, that look terrible and function even more poorly, because their integration wasn’t thought of up front!

3. Compliance, compliance, compliance!

Compliance with relevant codes and regulations is a critical aspect of fire safety engineering.

The kicker?

Keeping up-to-date with these codes and regulations can be a significant challenge, as they are constantly evolving and changing.

It’s no small feat for a busy project manager to stay informed about changes to codes and regulations which is why working with experienced fire safety engineering consultants can make all the difference to ensure that their buildings meet all relevant requirements.

Not only does this save money, time and effort – it massively reduces the potential legal burden that lack of compliance can bring about!

4. Fancy buildings = fancy fire safety solutions

Unique or complex building designs or layouts can present significant challenges in fire safety engineering.

For example, buildings with irregular shapes, unusual heights, or unconventional building materials may require specialised fire safety systems and solutions.

It’s a hugely specialised field of work, that project managers can’t be expected to know intimately.

A reliable, experienced, fire safety consultant however – they absolutely should be expected to handle this!

In fact – the more complex, unique, and challenging the build, the earlier you need to bring in the big guns to make sure the fire safety solutions developed are tailored to the specific needs of their building – and that they will actually be effective.

5. Engaging stakeholders with finesse

One of the key challenges in fire safety engineering is effectively engaging and coordinating with stakeholders throughout the project.

This can include everyone from building owners to architects to contractors, occupants, and regulatory authorities.

The tricky part is that each will have different priorities, expectations, and levels of understanding when it comes to fire safety.

So of course, this can and does lead to conflicting opinions, delays in decision-making, and difficulties in implementing necessary fire safety measures.

The other problem that often occurs here is that stakeholders may not fully appreciate the importance of fire safety engineering – nor the potentially disastrous consequences of inadequate measures.

The solution here is proactive communication, education, and collaboration to ensure early buy-in and long term commitment to fire safety objectives.

By fostering a shared understanding of fire safety, project managers can navigate the complexities of stakeholder engagement and ensure that fire safety engineering measures are implemented effectively throughout the project lifecycle.

Fire safety? Challenge accepted

Fire safety engineering is a critical component of building design and construction that requires careful consideration and planning.

While there are common challenges that can make it difficult for project managers to ensure that everything is up to code and everyone is safe, working with experienced fire safety engineering consultants can make all the difference.

Prioritising occupants with functional, fearless design, integrating fire safety from the ground up, staying compliant with relevant codes and regulations, developing solutions for unique or complex building designs or layouts, and creating effective evacuation plans and procedures are all important aspects of fire safety engineering.

By taking these challenges seriously and working with the right experts, project managers can protect their buildings and occupants from fire-related damage and loss.

It's time

Ready to put fire safety first?

Book a 60 minute training session over lunch to get your team of PM’s upskilled.